Evolution of Management Concepts in the Demand Chain Management (DCM) from POME by Gautam KOppala

Evolution of Management Concepts in the Demandprocess re-engineering and time-based management
Chain Management (DCM)caught on and, if properly applied, could serve as a
Management concepts come and go. Some rise,basis for effective and efficient use of new ICT tools.
explode and fall back like fireworks. Some remain likeThe fourth and fifth generations of logistics –
the North Star brightly shining and serving as guidelinesrespectively the time and process one and the
for navigation on the stormy seas of management.IT-based one – were born. They served as the
The first major issue, then, is to learn how to distinguishlaunching pad for increased and improved integration in
between fads and lasting, innovative concepts. Thesupply chains. They also pointed to the need to focus
next issue is to find out how to implement concepts;on inter-Projectal processes, rather than on institutions
what kind of methods and tools we need; how toin the chain. Different definitions of SCM illustrate this
educate to change mindsets; and what the best waychange of focus (Cooper, Lambert and Pagh, 1998).
is to design the transformation process.The implementation of SCM was enabled and
One way to distinguish between concepts and thefacilitated by two important toolboxes that were
rest is to use a holistic approach and see how the bitsdeveloped in the 1990s – business resource
fit together to create a new pattern. When Taylormanagement and e-logistics.
wrote about scientific management, he observed and 
summarized things that were happening in researchBusiness resource management
and practice. He established a theory – or a frameIn the 1980s, the need for deeper integration and
of reference – for the emerging industrial society.synchronization of processes across functional areas
One reason for the success of scientific managementbecame urgent. In order not to get stuck in traditional
was the obvious need for a new paradigm to guidefunctional or departmental silos, the focus was on
the transition from handicraft to industrial manufacturing.interdepartmental resources and processes. This
Today there is a need for a new paradigm for theholistic view was called business resource
shift from the industrial to the digital society. It is obviousmanagement (BRM) (Ericsson, 1990). It had its roots in
that 'something is trying to happen'. There are islandsclassical management literature, where the four main
of rethinking and new frames of reference popping upresources were 'men, materials, machines and money'
in the ocean of business strategy and management.– with information as a major new resource. The
What is needed is a holistic frame of reference thataim was to create a framework for integration of
can help bridge the troubled waters separating thoseresources, flows and processes.
islands.BRM is a broad, holistic management approach, and
Demand chain management (DCM) is an importantsoon it became evident that it also could be used as a
new business model to help with this. Electrolux, one ofbasis for inter-Projectal process management. The
the world's leading appliance projects, has created itsfocus on resources, flows and processes was an
own version of DCM, called demand flow leadershipexcellent starting point for process-oriented SCM and
– and these words are carefully chosen. DemandDCM.
means consumer-centric, with all activities based onE-logistics
consumer insight. Flow suggests an even, steady,BRM is a forerunner of the broadening of the logistics
uninterrupted and quality-assured value stream – asconcept into e-logistics – which is a toolbox for
opposed to a chain of sequential, connected links.improving inter-Projectal relations. It was a response to
Leadership refers to the fact that the demand flowsthe increasing interdependence between logistics and
are not Projectal units that have to be managed.ICT.
Demand flows are processes where leaders canThe evolution of the logistics concept illustrates the
emerge anywhere in the value network. Their effortsinterplay between visions and tools. In the early history
have to be supported by executives with a vision ofof logistics development, tools were lagging behind
what can be achieved.visions and we were asking for more tools – in the
Man is limited not so much by his tools as by hismid-1990s, however, the tools surpassed the visions
visions.and the next issue was to renew the vision and
(Christopher Columbus)create ways of using the new tools (Ericsson, 1996,
The evolution of management concepts is influenced2003). E-logistics was launched to provide a
by several things. One of the most important isframework for using the new tools of logistics,
executive vision, which is important for identificationprocess management and ICT – and the
and application of relevant methods and tools. Anotheropportunities created by the interplay between them.
is new tools, which create new possibilities. InformationE-logistics is the enabler of increased collaboration in
and communication technology (ICT) is a major triggerthe supply chain and it also creates opportunities for
for renewal – and also a major enabler in thetrue consumer orientation.
transition from the old industrial to the new digital world.New tools are continuously developing, while old ones
The availability of new ICT tools is increasing rapidly,change focus and use. For example, the concept of
and the trick is to know which ones to use and forquick response is not new, but it has a new and
what purpose – with implementation driven bydeeper meaning when used to give customer
business needs and not by technology availability.orientation in fast-moving industries. New ICT tools –
External developments also have to be analysed andespecially customer databases – improve relations
classified in order of importance. External opportunitieswith customers and enable point-of-sale and
and threats should be transformed into action andpoint-of-demand techniques. New tools for linking
internal adaptation – triggering internal rethinking andenterprise databases, applications and business
restructuring. Increasing global competition puts heavysystems are also developing fast.
stress on proaction rather than reaction – and it isSupply chain management
important to identify trends early and benefit fromThe concept of supply chain management evolved as
them. For example, identification of emerging consumera response to the necessity of improving and
needs, and efforts to turn market volatility from aextending cooperation. The relationships in supply
threat to an opportunity are two of the major goals ofchains moved from arm's length, often adversarial,
DCM.transactions to different levels of integration –
A lot of today's thinking has its roots far back inranging from coordination, through cooperation to
history, but visions that earlier could not be reachedcollaboration. Then e-logistics, with its focus on process
because of lack of efficient tools can now be realized.management, is a major enabler of both SCM and
The next issue, then, asks how new concepts shouldDCM.
be implemented to create lasting change. To get aThere are several ways of defining processes in
better understanding of this it is worth looking back inbusiness (Cooper, Lambert and Pagh, 1998). I have
history, to learn from experience and see how lastingchosen to distinguish between three core business
management concepts have developed over time.processes:time-to-cash,time-to-market, andcustomer
In order to look forward we have to look back.creation and retention.
The diffusion of a concept like DCM follows the usualThe time-to-cash process includes the total materials,
S-shaped curve, with early adopters and laggards. It isinformation and payment flows.
also clear that there will never be completeTime-to-market is the total process for creation,
implementation in any sample of projects, as thedevelopment and improvement of products and
concept simply does not fit all conditions. We can seeservices.
this in the development of other managementThe customer creation and retention process creates
concepts. In 1981, it described the development ofand retains customer relations all the way from the
production, sales and marketing orientation to provide afirst contact, via after-sales, follow-up and continuous
background to the evolving materials flow conceptsimprovement (Ericsson, 2003).
(Ericsson, 1981)  I wanted to show how concepts buildThe difference between logistics and SCM becomes
on each other and develop partly in response toclear if we take these processes as the starting point.
problems created by an old concept. The best partsBoth concepts focus on the flow from raw materials
of the old concept remain and are refined, while theto ultimate user. MA/logistics has its main focus on the
flaws are removed. There is a considerable overlap inmaterials flow and its connected information flows. In
time, with laggards still introducing a new concept whileother words, it is focused on the time-to-cash process.
early adopters are leaving for an even newer concept.The SCM concept also considers the other two core
Intense, global competition makes it more and moreprocesses –time-to-market andcustomer creation
dangerous to lag behind, as concept life cycles – likeand retention.
product life cycles – get shorter over time.Hence, the SCM concept is broader than the MA
 logistics concept. It focuses on the integration and
Production orientationsynchronization of inter-Projectal relations and
In the early 1900s, production orientation developed asprocesses. This explicitly changes the focus from the
a natural response to increasing demand for industrialindividual company to the supply chain as a whole.
goods. Scientific management focused on theSCM developed as a remedy for reoccurring
production process and the possibility of increasingproblems at the interfaces between entities in the
productivity through rationalization. Taylor 's frame ofchain. It was important to 'get the entities to act as
reference and the availability of new methods andone', which was apparent when the fact that
tools hastened development and accelerating growth.competition takes place more between supply chains
Keith (1959) summarized the management philosophythan between individual projects started to be
of Pillsbury for the years 1891 to 1930, saying, 'Our taskrecognized and accepted (Christopher, 1992).
is to grind flour of high quality and to sell it. However, itHowever, in practice, it still was very much 'us' against
is important that the business idea is built on the'them' both inside supply chains and in relation to
availability of wheat and water-power – not theoutside customers. Everyone talked about
availability and closeness of growing markets or theconsumer-centric approaches, but they were not being
demand for better and cheaper flour.' Such a narrowimplemented. This creates increasingly severe
view causes problems when productivity increasesproblems when the locus of power shifts down the
and getting rid of the product becomes a problem.supply chain to the final customer. Global competition,
Early writers observed this and pointed to the demandincreased volatility and decreasing product life cycles
market as the major problem. In 1915 Shaw wrote,accentuated the problems. It became clear that there
'Even if we are still on the threshold to all thewas a need for a new business model.
possibilities offered by increasing productivity, theThe evolution of a new business model
development has already surpassed existingWe need a completely new way of thinking in order to
distribution systems. We have to find markets for thesolve the problems we have created by using the old
products we can manufacture. The most importantway of thinking.
issue today is to systematically study distribution in theThe evolution of the DCM concept is, maybe, the first
same way as we have been studying manufacturing.'step towards a major rethinking. The transition from
Despite this, laggards still stuck to production orientationyesterday's business model into tomorrow's is shown
until the 1950s and 1960s. which illustrates that we are moving from a push to
Sales orientationa pull approach – from an SCM to a DCM. We are
In the 1920s, the view of sales orientation evolved, withmoving from yesterday's model based on independent,
Borsodi (1929) summarizing the change of focus byinventory-based entities aiming for low-cost production
saying, 'The days are gone when the recipe for bigto tomorrow's model with information-based virtual
profit simply was manufacturing, more manufacturingnetworks aiming for creation of perceived consumer
– and even more manufacturing! The distributionvalue. Supplier-driven mass production and mass
age is here.' Then Pillsbury's philosophy changed to: 'Asmarketing are replaced by market-driven mass
a flour producing company with many differentcustomization and one-to-one marketing.
products for the consumer market, we need a first 
class sales force to get rid of all the products we canIf we believe in this description it is quite clear where
produce at a good price' (Keith, 1959).we are and where we are heading. The question is
The sales orientation was sufficient in a seller's market,how to get there. The first step is to make some
when demand is higher than supply. However, wheninternal as well as external adaptations and alignments.
the situation was reversed, a change of mindset wasInternal alignments
needed. The sales orientation was successivelyThere is clearly a need for closer integration of
replaced by a marketing orientation.logistics/SCM and relationship marketing (Ericsson,
Marketing orientation2003). The concept of relationship marketing has
A 'new marketing concept' was launched in the earlyevolved into customer relationship management
1950s – with authors making a distinction between(CRM), which allows a business to target customers
the old production and sales concepts and the newmore closely and implement one-to-one marketing
marketing concept. It was stressed that marketing isstrategies where appropriate, and which makes the
consumer-centric and focuses on analysis, planning,alignment with SCM even more important. The key is
product development and profitability – and not onlyto knit together the knowledge and expertise from
sales volume.SCM with the knowledge of marketing/sales and
Pillsbury's philosophy changed again to: 'Todaybuyer behaviour. Internally, this is a question of getting a
marketing in our company is seen as the function thatcommon demand chain strategy that is based on both
plans and executes sales – the whole way fromthe marketing/sales and logistics/SCM strategies.
idea generation, through development and sales to theDemand creation has to be synchronized with demand
customer. Marketing starts and ends with thefulfilment. In theory, this is obvious, but there still is a long
consumer… the marketing department leads allway to go before this is implemented in practice.
company resources in the transformation of the ideaExternal alignments
to a product and the product to a sales agreement'Externally, processes and systems must also be
(Keith, 1959). This statement could have been writtenaligned and synchronized:
today, with the major difference that we now have1. Perceived customer values and the market
the tools to carry it through. The focus had shiftedsegments have to be defined to answer the question,
from production to marketing, from the products we'What are the explicit and implicit demands and
can manufacture to the products the consumer reallyrequirements of the customer?'
wants and from the company to the market.2. Value chain processes are defined to answer the
But the new marketing concept started to create itsquestion, 'What processes should be synchronized in
own problems, most of which came from tooorder to fulfil the needs and demands in the value
far-reaching customer orientation with focus onsegments?'
service and delivery – without any deeper analysis3. The network structure of the customized supply
of the concepts and the consequences. Scatteredchain (the value chain) must be defined, answering the
remedies were popping up, but most of these werequestion, 'Who are the key value chain members with
fads rather than cures. They generally demandedwhom to link processes?'
more flexibility and smaller batch sizes in4. Value chain management components are defined
manufacturing, while focusing on delivery lead timesbased on the question, 'What level of integration and
– and gave higher inventory, transportation andmanagement should be applied for each process link?'
handling costs. The lack of a theoretical framework(Cooper, Lambert and Pagh, 1998).
and a common language resulted in tension andMost contemporary DCM research focuses on
conflicts between marketing and manufacturing –interfaces in the commercial channel, ie on B2B
and increasing struggles for power. These problemsrelations, but the interface between the commercial
initiated the development of the materials flowchannel and the consumer is the most important one.
orientation, when it became clear that the problemsBecause of the direct demand, the consumer's wants,
could only be solved with a more holistic approach.desires and needs are of a different nature. The focus
Materials flow orientationon consumer insight and deep knowledge of consumer
In the early 1960s the materials flow approach startedneeds and wishes is the major difference between
to spread in Sweden. It grew rather slowly to the enddemand-driven SCM and DCM.
of the 1960s, and then took off when the concept ofDemand chain management
materials administration was developed through closeIn recent years, there has been intense discussion of
collaboration between universities and major industrialSCM and DCM. Is there a choice of either one or the
projects such as Volvo, SKF, Atlas Copco, Sandvikother? Should DCM replace SCM? Is DCM just
and Astra. The approach was called materialsanother name for demand-driven supply chain or is it
administration because it was a much broader andcompletely new? My conclusion is that DCM is a
more strategic concept than logistics at that time (seenatural next step in the evolution of the SCM concept
Ericsson, 2003). In particular, materials administrationbased on the necessity for adaptation to changing
(MA) was defined as 'Planning, development,external and internal conditions and the availability of
coordination, Project, control and review of thenew tools. It is a matter of adapting to changing
materials flow from raw materials supplier to thecircumstances and creating and using the right tools.
ultimate user' (Ericsson, 1969b).Responsiveness is the key to the new global
The concept focused the need for integratedeconomy – and also to the DCM approach.
management of the inflow, throughput and outflow.'Customer ecstasy – at a profit' is the battle-cry of
From the start, MA stressed coordination and thethe new global economy (Ericsson, 2003). The key is
strategic aspects of effective materials flows, but itto create value to the consumer, but in a
also emphasized that implementation had to startcost-effective and efficient way. This is, in a nutshell,
internally with synchronization of purchasing, productionthe mission of the DCM approach.
and physical distribution on an operational and tacticalFrom a theoretical point of view, DCM is a logical way
level  The internal structuring of the company mustof refocusing and creating a new business model for
increase cooperation and synchronization of activitiesthe digital and global society. Intensified competition and
in different departments.the availability of new tools push for a change of
The focus on internal processes was the starting pointfocus. The question is can we see any sign of a new
for the implementation, but it was clear that internalmodel in practical applications – or is the concept
efficiency was not enough, and links with suppliers andjust another academic fad?
customers also had to be improved and coordinated.Practical applications
The first step was to improve cooperation on theThere is some evidence of DCM emerging in business.
supply side. Supplier development and evaluation,Over the years, power in the distribution channel has
stockless buying, systems contracting andmoved from the manufacturer to the wholesaler and
co-makership became key words in this developmentretailer. Today, the power rests with the consumer.
(Ericsson, 1969c).This makes direct contact between the manufacturer
The next step was to increase cooperation withand the consumer a vital ingredient in creating
first-tier customers. Early writers on marketing focusedcompetitive strength. Dell has solved this problem with
on consumer markets, but now the interest in industrialclose collaboration with suppliers and customers.
marketing – and hence in industrial buying –However, most projects cannot bypass intermediaries,
increased (Ericsson, 1969a). the term 'control' in theso relationships with retailers are crucial, as they form
definition of MA refers to the use of developingthe main interface with consumers.
computer tools for managing materials flows. InitialThe car industry has been trying to handle this problem
steps focused on operational and tactical levels in thefor some time and has used all types of electronic
company, but soon the strategic aspects of MA cametools. However, in 2001, an industry analyst stated that
into focus – not only for directly flow-related'The business model for the car industry is broken'
functions such as purchasing, production and physical(USA Today, 2001). GM had already started to create
distribution, but also with marketing and R&D anda new model for the car industry, and they launched a
engineering.project for 'Building a digital loyalty network through
Phases in the development of the materialsdemand and supply chain integration' – with the
administration/ logistics conceptpurpose of benefiting from closer integration of
The early development of the concept shows apurchasing/SCM, marketing and ICT.
typical growth curve: a rather slow start withOn the retail side, Wal-Mart is often cited for its
acceleration in the early 1970s, as shown inbelowintelligent use of information and for running the entire
(Ericsson 1981, 2003; Green, 1989).Project on the basis of consumer demand. This allows
 it automatically to delist products from a group of
The first generation of logistics – thestores after only two days of performing badly. IKEA's
total-cost-oriented one – came as a response toability to move goods quickly from its suppliers, through
increasing need for a holistic view on costs. Thewarehouses and on to stores is impressive. Products
functional and silo-oriented approach that had evolvedare packaged and sold to consumers in a way that
as a consequence of the division of labour had gonefacilitates speed through the chain. IKEA measures
too far. By the 1950s this approach had started tototal logistics costs for products in terms of
show major weaknesses – trade-offs betweentransportation, storage and investment in inventory.
functions and departments were hard to achieve andThe capital cost is especially important, and the
sub-optimization was a major threat. Luckily, somecompany often works with double sourcing – one
new methods and tools were appearing to solve theregional supplier and a low-cost supplier in Asia –
problem, such as operational research models andwith the control system making it possible to switch
emerging computer technology. So the first generationsource quickly depending on sales.
of materials administration/logistics was born in 1969 asToday, the fashion industry is an archetype of the new
a response to problems and needs – and thebusiness model, and the Spanish company Zara is
increasing availability of effective tools.maybe the best example. In the volatile world of
The vision is 'to create an even, steady, uninterruptedfashion, where trends go in and out of style very
and quality assured flow from raw materials supplier toquickly, Zara is efficient at minimizing obsolescent stock
the ultimate user' (Ericsson, 1969b). This was a guidingand bringing new products to shops very quickly.
statement of the ideal situation when all members ofConcluded Note
the flow think and act as one. This vision is very closeWhat, then, can we learn about the development of
to Towill's (1997) concept of the 'seamless supplymanagement concepts? We can certainly see that
chain'.history repeats itself – as concepts come and go
External conditions changed again with rapid growth inand reappear in a slightly modified and refined shape.
the 1960s replaced by zero growth of the 1970s. TheFor example, consumer orientation was stressed in the
problem was then to gain a bigger share of a1950s as the key to success in 'the new marketing
non-growing cake. The solution was the secondconcept'. Today, it is the key to success in the DCM
generation of logistics – the revenue-oriented oneapproach – with consumer insight going deeper and
– based on logistics as a means of competition.having more tools available than the old customer
One of the ways of increasing sales was to increaseorientation. However, it is evident that implementation
the local presence with sales outlets and warehouseswill be just as bothersome as it was with the
close to the customer. The number of warehousesmarketing concept, and it still takes time.
and number of items exploded – with the capitalUnlearning is more difficult than learning – so a
tied up in inventory creating new challenges. Thischange of tools is easier and swifter than a transition
triggered the third generation of logistics – theof mindsets. The change process has to be based on
profitability-oriented one – that was born in thea vision and a consistent frame of reference, which is
1980s.based on earlier experience. Implementation has to be
During the late 1980s and the early 1990s the need forwell planned and systematic, and a common language
more and better integration both internally andmust be established within the change network.
externally increased – but communication andTraining and education are the key!
integration tools were developing fast. Business